From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New Contrib Build? |
Date: | 2005-05-11 22:28:57 |
Message-ID: | 42828729.8060302@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What if we could build contrib modules through a build-time switch for
>>>PostgreSQL? Like,
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>I honestly don't see that it buys a lot. (and the technical obstacle is
>>that there's a maintenance cost, if nothing else).
>>
>>
>
>I'm with Andrew on this: what's the point? We don't currently have
>any contrib modules that are noticeably harder to build than any others,
>and I don't see any coming over the horizon.
>
>
I'd buy it more with Jim Nasby's suggested --with-contrib option. Or
let's say --with-modules.
One nice side effect would be that this info would get into pg_config's
configure settings. That would also help to make the whole build more
replayable.
To be of any use I guess this should ensure that the specified modules
are built, installed and tested from the main makefile.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-05-11 23:44:06 | Re: Understanding Rule System |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-11 22:04:30 | Re: New Contrib Build? |