Re: New Contrib Build?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New Contrib Build?
Date: 2005-05-11 22:28:57
Message-ID: 42828729.8060302@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What if we could build contrib modules through a build-time switch for
>>>PostgreSQL? Like,
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>I honestly don't see that it buys a lot. (and the technical obstacle is
>>that there's a maintenance cost, if nothing else).
>>
>>
>
>I'm with Andrew on this: what's the point? We don't currently have
>any contrib modules that are noticeably harder to build than any others,
>and I don't see any coming over the horizon.
>
>

I'd buy it more with Jim Nasby's suggested --with-contrib option. Or
let's say --with-modules.

One nice side effect would be that this info would get into pg_config's
configure settings. That would also help to make the whole build more
replayable.

To be of any use I guess this should ensure that the specified modules
are built, installed and tested from the main makefile.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2005-05-11 23:44:06 Re: Understanding Rule System
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-11 22:04:30 Re: New Contrib Build?