Re: Partitioning / Clustering

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Alex Stapleton <alexs(at)advfn(dot)com>
Cc: John A Meinel <john(at)arbash-meinel(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioning / Clustering
Date: 2005-05-11 01:24:10
Message-ID: 42815EBA.7010806@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> This is why I mention partitioning. It solves this issue by storing
> different data sets on different machines under the same schema. These
> seperate chunks of the table can then be replicated as well for data
> redundancy and so on. MySQL are working on these things

*laff*

Yeah, like they've been working on views for the last 5 years, and still
haven't released them :D :D :D

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mischa Sandberg 2005-05-11 01:34:26 Re: Partitioning / Clustering
Previous Message Mischa Sandberg 2005-05-11 00:14:26 Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL