Re: Whence the Opterons?

From: John A Meinel <john(at)arbash-meinel(dot)com>
To: Anjan Dave <adave(at)vantage(dot)com>
Cc: Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net>, Mischa Sandberg <mischa(dot)sandberg(at)telus(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Whence the Opterons?
Date: 2005-05-09 15:22:03
Message-ID: 427F801B.7070601@arbash-meinel.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Anjan Dave wrote:
> You also want to consider any whitebox opteron system being on the
> compatibility list of your storage vendor, as well as RedHat, etc. With
> EMC you can file an RPQ via your sales contacts to get it approved,
> though not sure how lengthy/painful that process might be, or if it's
> gonna be worth it.
>
> Read the article devoted to the v40z on anandtech.com.
>
> I am also trying to get a quad-Opteron versus the latest quad-XEON from
> Dell (6850), but it's hard to justify a difference between a 15K dell
> versus a 30k v40z for a 5-8% performance gain (read the XEON Vs. Opteron
> Database comparo on anandtech.com)
>
> Thanks,
> Anjan
>

15k vs 30k is indeed a big difference. But also realize that Postgres
has a specific benefit to Opterons versus Xeons. The context switching
storm happens less on an Opteron for some reason.

I would venture a much greater benefit than 5-8%, more like 10-50%.

John
=:->

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Petrilli 2005-05-09 15:27:54 Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL 8.0)
Previous Message John A Meinel 2005-05-09 15:18:15 Re: Whence the Opterons?