Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-06 15:38:16
Message-ID: 427B8F68.7040004@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> As far as I know, PLs or contrib files *aren't* tested by the
> regression tests, so, at best, they are getting 'spotty testing' right
> now when we release ... we know they build, that's it. And that won't
> change before/after ... Andrew is looking to add PL testing to the
> build farm, something that isn't done now ...
>

contrib modules with install checks are tested now on buildfarm, and
have been from day one.

PL testing is a high priority - I hope to get it done this month before
my trip to aus.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-06 15:44:28 Re: pgFoundry
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-05-06 15:33:08 Re: pgFoundry