| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | lists(at)benjamindsmith(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres vs Firebird? |
| Date: | 2005-05-05 19:10:40 |
| Message-ID: | 427A6FB0.4070103@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Replication is the only thing that remains, and there appears to be
> commercially viable solutions for that, as well, though we've not yet
There are two very popular replication solutions, one of them is OSS
which is Slony-I. The other is commercial which is Mammoth PostgreSQL
Replicator.
> implemented it. We're still in a very heavy product development phase, and we
> have a pretty good backup solution.
>
> When will PG replication come ready "out of the box" with the RH RPMs?
When RH starts shipping 8 you will see Slony-I as it is already part of
contrib.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-05-05 19:21:17 | Re: Booleans - Why in Postgres and not in Oracle or Mysql? |
| Previous Message | CSN | 2005-05-05 18:57:16 | Booleans - Why in Postgres and not in Oracle or Mysql? |