Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

pl-j and pl/java are working together to create a shared interface so that
they can co-exist. This is the part that we wish to have added to the
main source
tree. It will just be the C portion of the code that does rely on the
backend.

Dave

Tom Lane wrote:

>"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>Kind of offtopic but at that point should we also include plJava?
>>
>>
>
>Not decided, but it's surely on the radar screen for this discussion.
>Joe Conway's PL/R is in the back of my mind as well --- it likely has
>a smaller userbase than the first two, but from a maintenance standpoint
>it probably belongs on the same level.
>
>
>
>>Should we put plPHP in contrib/plphp? With its own build options?
>>
>>
>
>Not under contrib either: it's got to be a separate source tree.
>I grow a bit weary and am not seeing exactly how this maps to a CVS
>setup... do we need more than one CVS module?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>
>
>

--
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561