Re: Views, views, views! (long)

From: Tim Allen <tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Views, views, views! (long)
Date: 2005-05-05 05:03:49
Message-ID: 4279A935.2040600@proximity.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> PG hackers,

[snip]

> What We Need From Hackers --------------------------------------
> (other than patch approval, that is) As stated above, these system
> views, once incorporated into a pg distribution, are likely to be
> with us *forever*. As such, we really can't afford to do major
> refactoring of the column names and structure once they're released.
> So it's really, really, important for everyone on hackers to look
> over the definitions below and find stuff that we've missed or
> doesn't make any sense. Also, we'd like to know about 8.1 changes
> that affect these views.

This all looks good to me, from a quick read through. I don't claim to
have examined the details, but the general idea is definitely something
that would be very worth having.

A nice thing to add would be a more human-comprehensible view of the
pg_locks table. I keep meaning to write a view for it myself, but
haven't ever gotten a round tuit.

Tim

--
-----------------------------------------------
Tim Allen tim(at)proximity(dot)com(dot)au
Proximity Pty Ltd http://www.proximity.com.au/
http://www4.tpg.com.au/users/rita_tim/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 05:08:20 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-05 05:01:47 Re: Views, views, views! (long)