Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-05 04:50:47
Message-ID: 4279A627.2040506@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>
>>On Wed, 4 May 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>>So where are we going?
>
>
>>plphp.tar.gz being seperately buildable from the core distribution,
>>without the core distribution source files ...
>
>
> That is, plphp should build against an installed set of postgres
> headers, not within a postgres source tree. This is the only workable
> thing from the standpoint of downstream packagers.

O.k. let me run this through the developers. I can't imagine that it
will be that difficult.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 05:08:20 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 03:30:16 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 04:56:13 Re: Views, views, views! (long)
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-05 04:37:40 Views, views, views! (long)