From: | Peter Wilson <peter(dot)j(dot)wilson(at)ntlworld(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres vs Firebird? |
Date: | 2005-05-04 20:40:29 |
Message-ID: | 4279333D.1040004@ntlworld.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Benjamin Smith wrote:
>
>> As a long-time user of Postgres, (First started using it at 7.0) I'm
>> reading recently that Firebird has been taking off as a database.
>> Perhaps this is not the best place to ask this, but is there any
>> compelling advantage to using Firebird over Postgres?
>
> Firebird is a nice database but I don't think it can scale as well as
> PostgreSQL. IIRC they just added support for SMP. Also, although their
> community is very active I do not believe it is as large nor does it
> have the commercial backing like PostgreSQL.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
> Command Prompt, Inc.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
Haven't used it, but your question sparked a little interest so I spent
some time trawling through their web-site.
Like many open-source projects, documentation seems to be lagging a
*very* long way behind the code. One of the things that has really
impressed me with Postgres is the quality and thoroughness of the
documentation. As a developer I need API documentation, not just a quick
start guide and list of errors. I tend to avoid projects that don't
bother with the documentation (I gave up on Slony-I very quickly for
exactly the same reason!)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aaron Steele | 2005-05-04 21:06:44 | Re: remote tcp connection problem PG 8.0.1 |
Previous Message | Zlatko Matic | 2005-05-04 20:33:23 | Re: [INTERFACES] calculated identity field in views, again... |