| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des(at)des(dot)no> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Regression tests |
| Date: | 2005-05-04 07:20:59 |
| Message-ID: | 427877DB.8050607@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Quite, but in the meantime, a good benchmark should stress the system
> enough to cause crashes, lockups or at least incorrect results if a
> bug is introduced in the shared memory or semaphore code, and will
> definitely reveal any slowdowns introduced by new code, so my question
> is: where can I find a good benchmark for PostgreSQL? Note that I
> don't care about comparing PostgreSQL to other RDBMSes; I just want to
> a) test PostgreSQL under high concurrent load and b) if possible,
> measure the performance impact of a patch.
You can use contrib/pgbench as a rather simplistic test, or you could
try OSDB (http://osdb.sourceforge.net/)
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-05-04 07:36:12 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2005-05-04 07:05:37 | Re: Interesting article on transactional algorithms includes |