Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-03 18:58:10
Message-ID: 4277C9C2.7040202@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>>>
>>
>> How ugly. [remaining comments unprintable]
>
>
> That's a matter of opinion ... in our environment, it means that
> clients can enable/disable PHP features on a per VM basis without
> having to build a new PHP binary for each ... *shrug*
>
>

Different issue. You can do that on RH / Fedora too.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2005-05-03 19:19:12 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-05-03 18:55:11 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2005-05-03 19:19:12 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2005-05-03 18:55:15 Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c?