Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-03 18:53:49
Message-ID: 4277C8BD.6040709@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

>
>
> That's a matter of opinion ... in our environment, it means that clients
> can enable/disable PHP features on a per VM basis without having to
> build a new PHP binary for each ... *shrug*

Gentoo also does this :)

>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-05-03 18:55:11 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-03 18:51:44 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-05-03 18:55:11 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-03 18:53:23 Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c?