Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-03 17:22:49
Message-ID: 4277B369.6040807@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

>
> My primary desire is to avoid having to download several Meg of tar
> ball(s) in order to add a module to an existing server ... if that can
> be accomplished, then my main objection to adding things to the core CVS
> are eliminated ...

I guess I don't see the problem of the PostgreSQL distribution being 11
megs, heck even 50 megs. I know that some places don't have the
bandwidth we do but it only takes me about 90 seconds to download the
distribution.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-03 17:36:52 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-03 17:20:10 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-03 17:36:52 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-03 17:20:10 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement