From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-05-03 17:22:49 |
Message-ID: | 4277B369.6040807@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
>
> My primary desire is to avoid having to download several Meg of tar
> ball(s) in order to add a module to an existing server ... if that can
> be accomplished, then my main objection to adding things to the core CVS
> are eliminated ...
I guess I don't see the problem of the PostgreSQL distribution being 11
megs, heck even 50 megs. I know that some places don't have the
bandwidth we do but it only takes me about 90 seconds to download the
distribution.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-03 17:36:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-03 17:20:10 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-03 17:36:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-03 17:20:10 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |