Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-02 20:40:44
Message-ID: 4276904C.2090307@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

>>>
>>> I thought it was still maintained?
>>
>>
>> Right, but it should be moved out of our CVS, I think.
>
>
> Agreed ... if someone can make the project, I can move the CVS files
> over ... does anyone know who is currently maintaining it though?

I can make the project but I obviously have no desire to maintain it.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-02 20:53:59 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2005-05-02 20:39:39 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-05-02 20:42:51 Re: pg_locks needs a facelift
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2005-05-02 20:39:39 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement