From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-05-02 19:05:40 |
Message-ID: | 42767A04.8050205@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
>>
>> The issue is that we have had to wack around the existing PL languages
>> for almost every release to make them work with server changes, and
>> being outside our CVS, plPHP isn't getting that whacking.
>
>
> And the point is, as Tom has pointed out with tsearch2, that even *in*
> CVS, it is a fair amount of work to 'whack' other ppls code ... it
> shouldn't be Tom's responsibility (which is generally what it comes down
> to) to keep someone else's code up to speed with changes in the server ...
Well we try to keep up :)
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-02 19:06:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-02 19:04:10 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-02 19:06:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-02 19:04:10 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |