| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-05-02 05:20:07 |
| Message-ID: | 4275B887.5090901@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not convinced that Postgres ought to provide
> a way to second-guess the TCP stack ... this looks to me like "I can't
> convince the network software people to provide me an easy way to
> override their decisions, so I'll beat up on the database people to
> override 'em instead. Perhaps the database people don't know the issues
> and can be browbeaten more easily."
Would you be ok with a patch that allowed configuration of the
TCP_KEEPCNT / TCP_KEEPIDLE / TCP_KEEPINTVL socket options on backend
sockets?
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Russell Smith | 2005-05-02 05:22:21 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-02 05:05:15 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Russell Smith | 2005-05-02 05:22:21 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-02 05:05:15 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |