| From: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? |
| Date: | 2005-05-01 22:57:03 |
| Message-ID: | 42755EBF.40600@phlo.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Andreas Pflug wrote:
>> wx2.5 is about to be removed from Debian official archive due
>> to bugs. It will leave pgadmin3 package in a broken state and
>> which would lead to a removal of it too. A transition is on
>> the way, Ron explained to me that he would surely upload
>> rapidly for wx2.6. I'd like to know if 1.2.0 would compile or
>> not and/or if it would be hard to get it build on top of
>> wx2.6 instead of 2.5...
>> If not, what is the roadmap, if there is one, to a next stable
>> release of pga3 based on top of wx2.6 ?
>
> Some week ago I fixed cvs so 1.2.2 will compile with wx2.6. Seems we
> should release 1.2.2 quite soon.
Would you be interested in releasing an osx version of 1.2.2 too?
If so, I could quite easily backport the build-system changes, and the
(very few) actual patches to 1.2.
But if you don't want to add a new platform with a minor-version update,
I'd safe myself the effort ;-)
greetings, Florian Pflug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-05-02 08:26:39 | Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-05-01 17:37:47 | Re: 1.2.0 status vs wx2.6 instead of wx2.5 ? |