From: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgfoundry moved ... |
Date: | 2005-04-28 17:24:49 |
Message-ID: | 42711C61.9010104@ehpg.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Hmm, that is interesting. I have no experience in troubleshooting
jails, but that server was a pgsql db server (on Gentoo Linux) prior to
being borg, and has been very quick under heavy loads without any I/O
issues.
Gavin
Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>If there are performance issues on www.postgresql.org it
>>seems silly not to use borg. The machine is way under
>>utilized and you have more than enough donated bandwidth to
>>play with there.
>>
>>
>
>The only performance issues related to the base www site right now I
>think is the fact that I/O is horribly slow in the jail for svr2 (which
>runs wwwmaster) and that one is already on borg IIRC. The mirror script
>runs a *lot* faster on a heavily loaded linux server that I've tested it
>on. Not sure if it's the I/O bw on borg that's over the edge, or if it's
>the jails themselves causing it. I know Dave talked about comparing I/O
>on the main host vs the jails, not sure if he ever got through to doing
>it.
>
>
>//Magnus
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-04-28 17:26:25 | Re: pgfoundry moved ... |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-28 17:13:17 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need help on drivers, add-ons |