From: | Hannes Dorbath <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: psqlODBC and Access |
Date: | 2005-04-24 10:50:22 |
Message-ID: | 426b744f$0$24353$8fe63b2a@news.disputo.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 23.04.2005 03:23, Typing80wpm(at)aol(dot)com wrote:
> Should I not use MONEY in defining such fields to
> be used with ACCESS? Is there a different TYPE that I should use in my
> definition? Thanks!
From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/datatype-money.html
"The money type is deprecated. Use numeric or decimal instead, in
combination with the to_char function."
> By the way, what would you suggest as a tool to administer the PostgreSQL
> databases. I mean, something sort of graphical which would display tables and
> names and relationships.
In case you don't like PgAdminIII you may try commercial products like
EMS PostgreSQL Manager
http://sqlmanager.net/products/postgresql/manager
What they call "Visual Database Designer" might just be what you are
looking for. It's an MS-Access-like, visual display of tables and
relations. But remember, it's a frontend and not a modelling tool.
For modelling better look at:
I don't think there's something better out there for the money, but it
takes some time to learn using it.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannes Dorbath | 2005-04-24 11:08:41 | Re: PHP and Postgresql on Windows |
Previous Message | Peter Wiersig | 2005-04-24 10:14:36 | Re: Had a problem with pg_clog |