Re: Final decision

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joel Fradkin <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Perform <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Final decision
Date: 2005-04-27 17:01:55
Message-ID: 426FC583.7050304@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>>
>> It is? No-one told the developers...
>
>
> We have mentioned it on the list.
>
> http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2002/07/16/drake.html

Ooops ;)

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2005-03/msg00109.php

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc.

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2005-04-27 17:16:48 Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-27 16:46:02 Re: Final decision