| From: | "apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de" <apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? |
| Date: | 2005-04-26 09:43:21 |
| Message-ID: | 426E0D39.5020001@yahoo.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ok!
The Links your posted are great and i guessing it will help me a lot!
But the other Question (if Tablepartitioning under Developemt and will
it be supported generally)
is still alive.
Josh
Qingqing Zhou wrote:
><apoc9009(at)yahoo(dot)de> writes
>
>
>>I have done the following Post to PSQL Performance, but Richard Huxton
>>say it
>>might be a better Idea to post it again on you List so i forward the
>>message.
>>
>>
>...
>
>
>>It is exiting to see thadt Verison 8.0 has Tablespaces like ORACLE and
>>DB/2,
>>but i need Partitioning on a few very large Tables.
>>
>>
>...
>
>Richard said you can *search* in this list ... Here are two links might be
>of your interests:
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-12/msg00101.php - how
>to do horizonal partition using inheritance;
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-03/msg00370.php - a
>long list of discussing the future partition implementation;
>
>
>Regards,
>Qingqing
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
>
>
*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-04-26 11:20:38 | bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster |
| Previous Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-04-26 09:25:12 | Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future? |