From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql |
Date: | 2005-04-26 05:54:34 |
Message-ID: | 426DD79A.10808@paradise.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
>
>>Personally I favor 1), so would prefer:
>>
>>enable it by default only for interactive sessions, like AUTOCOMMIT
>
>
> We are going for 'off' by default and only interactive.
Sweet.
> The fact that
> interactive and non-interactive behavior is different is something that
> suggests that turning it on by default might cause confusion.
>
True, but reasonably explained by suggesting that non-interactive
scripts should not be expected to keep going when there are typos or
similar. In fact, I seem to recall being burned by that very thing in my
early Oracle days...
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-26 06:00:52 | Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-26 05:32:35 | Re: simplify register_dirty_segment() |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2005-04-26 11:43:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-26 03:23:53 | Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql |