Re: OpenRPT (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenRPT (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly
Date: 2005-04-26 01:40:19
Message-ID: 426D9C03.3040304@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-announce pgsql-general

> Dave, thanks for the plug - and thanks to everyone who's expressed an
> interest in OpenRPT so far. It seems there are still some performance
> issues with pgFoundry (pending setup of new servers?) - so for now,
> we're going to do our best not to contribute to the load, and point
> people to OpenRPT's home on SourceForge, where the iron is big and the
> pipes fat:
>
> http://openrpt.sf.net/

Erm. I looked at that software. It's freakin' rad. Finally I can do
reports for managers without MS Access...

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2005-04-26 02:51:46 Re: OpenRPT
Previous Message elein 2005-04-25 17:40:23 Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2005-04-26 02:51:46 Re: OpenRPT
Previous Message Ned Lilly 2005-04-25 15:02:43 OpenRPT (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 24 2005 ==)

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-04-26 01:42:52 Re: Corruption on production system
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-04-26 01:03:52 Re: question about about future 8.1 and IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters