Re: Constant WAL replay

From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at
Subject: Re: Constant WAL replay
Date: 2005-04-25 19:22:21
Message-ID: 426D436D.1000604@cybertec.at
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Neil Conway wrote:
> Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
>
>> The idea: We are looking for a way to implement a synchronous
>> single-master / multiple slaves systems.
>> Meanwhile we are able to serialize / deserialize WAL records and send
>> them to a group communication system which transports those records to
>> the slave database.
>
>
> BTW, what is the benefit to using a GCS here?
>
> -Neil

currently i have used it because it is simple.
at the moment we are just doing experiments to see how log information
can be treated. shipping the data is not the problem - the real problem
is getting it back in.

good ideas are welcome ;)

best regards,

hans

--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria
Tel: +43/664/393 39 74
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2005-04-25 19:25:13 Re: Constant WAL replay
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-04-25 19:18:26 Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2005-04-25 19:25:13 Re: Constant WAL replay
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2005-04-25 17:51:31 Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql