From: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What does "tuple concurrently updated" mean? |
Date: | 2005-04-25 17:15:52 |
Message-ID: | 426D25C8.3080706@phlo.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> writes:
>
>>So - does "tuple concurrently updated" make sense for "analyze"?
>
> Yeah, it's entirely possible, if you have a background process that
> might issue analyzes too (do you use autovacuum?). The error comes when
> two sessions concurrently try to update the same row in pg_statistic.
> I've looked at preventing it, but the cure seems worse than the disease
> --- we don't really want ANALYZE to take any strong locks on the table,
> and in any case all you are losing is presumably-near-duplicate stats
> from one session or the other.
Hm... could this be turned into a warning then? I'll fix this
by ignoring db-errors when issuing analyze, but I belive this
will bite more people...
Anyway, thanks for your fast reply - I'll sleep much better,
now that I know the cause for this ;-)
greetings, Florian Pflug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wilson, David | 2005-04-25 17:26:01 | unsubscribe |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-25 17:02:50 | Re: What does "tuple concurrently updated" mean? |