From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes |
Date: | 2005-04-23 22:12:12 |
Message-ID: | 426AC83C.4070605@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> As Ron says, until we have partitioning, it isn't as useful for DW.
Well, it's a bit stronger than what I said. The last big DW I dealt
with did have previous quarter's data archived into different tables,
and those could be marked read-only. Also, quite a few of our
ID<->Value lookup tables have a fixed or slowly changing set of
values (products, states, etc); and those would benefit from index scans.
But yes, it'd be an even nicer feature with partitioning, since then
you could hypothetically keep inserting into a mostly-read-only table
and mark partitions read-only as needed.
I think I was trying to say it'd be even more useful for DW with
partitioning - and I hope that when partitioning is being designed
it considers the possibility of taking advantage of read-only
partitions if we happen to implement read-only tables.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-23 22:27:38 | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. |
Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2005-04-23 22:04:13 | Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. |