| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Date: | 2005-04-22 21:41:53 |
| Message-ID: | 42696FA1.8070502@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
>>
>>Secondly I would say that an ARC patent is ridiculous based on the above
>>experience.
>
>
> ARC is 2Q with the ability to dynamically resize the four cache pools.
So ARC is 2Q++. My point exactly :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-22 21:45:05 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-22 21:26:47 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-22 21:45:05 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-22 21:26:47 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |