Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!!

Dave Held wrote:

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl]
>>Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 12:06 PM
>>To: Tom Lane
>>Cc: Dave Held; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler
>>headaches!! :)
>>
>>[...]
>>Why don't we rewrite Postgres in D?
>>
>>http://www.digitalmars.com/d/
>>
>>:-D
>>
>>
>
>I see the smiley, but moving to C++ isn't just about switching
>to the latest fad language.
>

No, it's about moving to the fad language about 2 generations back ...

>First of all, you would literally
>have to rewrite it to use D. There would probably need to be
>very little work to make the Postgres codebase a conforming set
>of C++ programs (mostly renaming variables/types named 'class',
>'virtual', 'bool', etc.). Second, you can find a decent C++
>compiler on virtually every platform that has a C compiler.
>Third, C++ offers real advantages in type safety, exception
>handling, resource management, and even performance.
>
>

Unless you did a major rewrite it's hard to see any great advantages.
There are over 600,000 lines of code in Postgres by my rough count. The
potential rewrite effort is enormous. A thorough job would probably
consume a release cycle just on its own.

Also, "virtually every platform" isn't good enough - we have a number of
oddballs in our supported list, and it would have to include at least those.

>Even doing something as simple as writing a stored procedure
>in C is somewhat awkward because of all the boilerplate casting
>that must be done. I'm fairly certain that most of the macros
>in the stored procedure interface could go away if a C++ API
>were created.
>
>
>

On the downside, some of us (including me) have much more experience in
and ease with writing C than C++. I could certainly do it - I write
plenty of Java, so OO isn't a closed book to me, far from it - but
ramping up in it would take me at least some effort. I bet I'm not alone
in that.

So this would not be cost-free - very far from it.

cheers

andrew