From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
Date: | 2005-04-22 04:15:52 |
Message-ID: | 42687A78.7090402@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
> The fact this discussion has come up so rarely before indicates it is
> not a major issue for the community.
>
> As I said, come up with some wording that everyone can agree to and
> let's at least make a new item and see how it goes.
Well my vote is for more of a sledgehammer than a feather in this
regard. What does everyone else think is the real question.
>
> I personally know the patent system is a mess, but it is not an
> overriding issue in my work with PostgreSQL.
Your work with PostgreSQL (AFAIK) wouldn't run into the problem. People
like Berkus, myself, EnterpriseDB, Greenplumn, SRA (Yes I know they
employ you), PgSQL, Inc., are who are going to run into the problem.
All due respect but perhaps it is worth considering the issue as a total
community versus just how it affects you.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-22 04:18:29 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-22 04:09:08 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-22 04:18:29 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-22 04:09:08 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |