| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Date: | 2005-04-22 03:48:32 |
| Message-ID: | 42687410.1040105@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
>
> The patent thing just isn't high-profile enough to warrant adding a
> permanent link at this point. Is is a question of priority, not that
> there is anything wrong with a link text.
I hope that most in the PostgreSQL community disagree with you. Software
patents are likely the most very troubling. They are potentially
crippling to the OSS community.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-22 04:04:54 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2005-04-22 03:47:49 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-22 04:04:54 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
| Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2005-04-22 03:47:49 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |