Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Date: 2005-04-22 03:34:03
Message-ID: 426870AB.7080503@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>>Bruce,
>>
>>
>>>I think a News item is all we, as a group, are going to agree to at this
>>>point.
>>
>>Oh, I don't know. Who's opposing a web button? Is there really anyone in our
>
>
> Me. We didn't clean up the main PostgreSQL page to add someone else's
> button, especially some ranting organization. If you want to do it for
> your company, go ahead, it is your page, but the stuff we do have to be
> 100% or pretty close.

I am a little confused as to your argument Bruce. What is wrong with a
button or link on www.postgresql.org that publicizes a page on
www.postgresql.org the describes the communities stance on software patents.

The page could also of course have links as reference to other
legitimate anti-patent links (this is where I could see some tension).

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
>
>>active community who favors the introduction of software patents into Europe?
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-22 03:34:21 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Previous Message Chris Travers 2005-04-22 03:31:47 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-22 03:34:21 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Previous Message Chris Travers 2005-04-22 03:31:47 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents