Re: plperl user function

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: KeithW(at)narrowpathinc(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl user function
Date: 2005-04-21 20:38:01
Message-ID: 42680F29.4030907@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces


>
> Another question: Is there an issue with using the untrusted perl language?

IIRC you have to be a postgresql superuser (postgres) to execute an
untrusted language function.

> If the code is tested and working is there any real reason to continue to have
> "use strict;" and "use warnings;" in the function?

Only for manageability in the future.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Kind Regards,
> Keith
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-04-21 20:42:50 Re: plperl user function
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-21 20:36:58 Re: plperl user function