From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Olleg Samoylov <olleg(at)mipt(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1610: rewrite rule and sequence |
Date: | 2005-04-21 15:57:51 |
Message-ID: | 4267CD7F.3090100@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs |
Olleg Samoylov wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 1610
> Logged by: Olleg Samoylov
> Email address: olleg(at)mipt(dot)ru
> PostgreSQL version: 7.4.7
> Operating system: Linux debian-amd64
> Description: rewrite rule and sequence
> Details:
>
> Rule on view can't insert in table with "serial" field under not owner. Need
> grant privilege on sequence explicitly.
That's not a bug, it's a feature (as they say).
Although you can automatically generate sequences with the serial pseudo
-type, they are separate objects. Not only can you create them
separately from a table, you can have many columns using
nextval('my_sequence') as their default.
I suppose you could argue that a sequence only used by one table could
inherit that table's permissions by default, but I can see problems when
people reorder GRANT statements.
HTH
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sokolov Yura | 2005-04-21 17:56:48 | BUG #1614: Bug in contrib/btree_gist for text |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-21 15:28:59 | Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Olleg Samoylov | 2005-04-22 06:33:10 | Re: BUG #1610: rewrite rule and sequence |
Previous Message | Olleg Samoylov | 2005-04-21 12:19:44 | BUG #1610: rewrite rule and sequence |