Re: Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0

From: "Chris Hoover" <revoohc(at)sermonaudio(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Admin" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0
Date: 2005-04-13 18:08:50
Message-ID: 425D6032.6000703@sermonaudio.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
>> Here is what I have:
>> Virgin install of RH ES 3.0 from cd's (no update run right now)
>>
>> When I try to start installing the Postgresql rpms, I get the following:
>> [root(at)localhost postgresql_rpms]# rpm -Uvh
>> postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm
>> warning: postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature:
>> NOKEY, key ID 748f7d0e
>> error: Failed dependencies:
>> libecpg.so.4 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG
>> libpgtypes.so.1 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG
>> libpq.so.3 is needed by postgresql-libs-8.0.2-1PGDG
>> Suggested resolutions:
>> rh-postgresql-libs-7.3.4-8.i386.rpm
>
>
> It looks like you already have postgresql installed via RH 3. You need
> to remove it first, then install 8.
>
> Honestly, when working with the RH ES version it is better to compile
> anyway.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
>
>
I have checked, and postgresql is not installed on the system. Are
there some dependent rpms that the postgresql-lib rpm needs?

Why do you say it is better to compile (besides getting a "customized"
postgresql)? Are there major problems with the rpm builds? Our
management team really wants us to get away from compiling Postgresql if
at all possible. So, I am going to need a very good argument to keep
compiling Postgresql when we do this next project.

Thanks,

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Fradkin 2005-04-13 18:15:22 Re: Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-13 17:56:29 Re: Help installing 8.0.2 rpms on RH 3.0