Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced?
Date: 2005-04-13 03:19:08
Message-ID: 425C8FAC.4080608@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Given all the problems with unwanted recoding I've seen, I think such an
> encoding should be the default instead of unchecked-8-bits SQL_ASCII :-(

I agree, but that would be a nightmare of backwards compaitibility :D

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-04-13 05:57:37 Re: OUT parameters in PL/Java
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-04-13 03:03:17 Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding not enforced?