Re: Update aborted if trigger function fails?

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:55:30AM -0400, Carlos Moreno wrote:
>
>>I guess the concern came up as result of a particular
>>situation, in which failing to properly process the
>>trigger function is not that crucial (I wanted to
>>update some additional information that is "optional",
>>and that can be reconstructed easily after discovering
>>that the trigger function had been failing). But in
>
>
> If you can do some things asynchronously, and you don't care about
> them very much, then you can use LISTEN/NOTIFY to do such processing.

Thanks Andrew for the suggestion -- this may as well be
exactly the feature that I needed to begin with. I'm
not familiar with the details, but I'll go right away
to dig through the docs.

Thanks!

Carlos
--