Re: Security of ODBC debug log file leaves something to be

What psqlodbc versions RedHat uses?

At least there are three Enterprise versions:
- Red Hat ES 2
- Red Hat ES 3
- Red Hat ES 4

I know, that ES 2 and ES 3 use different psqlodbc versions.
I don't know about ES 4.
Which ODBC revisions they are in psqlodbc PostgreSQL CVS?
Each of them might need a different fix.

I don't know, wether I can fix those versions myself.
Here is an attached bugfix for the CVS HEAD.

---------------------------------------

I wrote and attached a fix for the following things
for the CVS HEAD branch (see the attached patch):
1. File permissions; chmod go-rwx for the log file: fixed in this patch.
SVr4, SVID, POSIX, X/OPEN, BSD 4.3 for umask()

2. Pipe redirection problem: fixed in this patch.
SVr4, SVID, POSIX, X/OPEN, BSD 4.3 for fd=open()
IEEE Std1003.1-1988 (POSIX.1) for fdopen().

These are not touched in the patch:
3. Log files are easy to guess: not fixed, because the whole idea of
logging is easy guessability.
Maybe the log directory could be changed?
4. Plaintext passwords are not accepted in log files: CVS HEAD is
already OK.

These fixes work with Debian Sarge, compiled by myself.
I don't know, wether these fixes even compile with Windows XP or some
other system.
I hope, that they compile with many architectures because of the POSIX
compatibility.

I fixed the pipe redirection problem by forcing the creation of the log
file.
If the log file exists already, no logging is done.
It prints an error message into stderr (only once).
So it can't be a pipe or a soft link! This problem remains with NFS:
open() with O_EXCL does not work properly with NFS (see man 2 open).

Marko Ristola

Mischa Sandberg wrote:

>Quoting Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>
>
>
>>I got a complaint here
>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154126
>>pointing out that when you set debug=1, the generated log file
>>is world-readable by default, which doesn't seem like a good
>>idea when it may contain your password.
>>Any thoughts about fixing this? It's hard to believe no one
>>has pointed it out before, so I was wondering if there was some
>>good reason for doing it like this.
>>
>>
>
>Read your comments in the bug report. No, it is not intentional.
>It is just YA case of ODBC paying only lip service to security.
>There are still many commercial drivers that send the password over TCP,
>in the clear. Gah.
>
>Both the driver manager and the driver write to the debug log.
>Each of them is responsible for not doing things like that!
>File permissions on the log itself are rather weak protection.
>
>When I worked for Simba (ODBC kit/SQL engine company, now owned by orbital.com)
>we patch iODBC so that the password string was overwritten with "*"s
>before it was logged; and our driver kit did the same.
>It is simple to fix. Can't guarantee I can make the time right now;
>having too much antifun with Postgres performance on Solaris.
>
>
>