From: | NielsG <NielsG(at)aquafold(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Minor Feature Request |
Date: | 2005-04-05 23:36:34 |
Message-ID: | 42532102.9070006@aquafold.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi,
There are two issues that I am trying to solve. One is for my SQL Query
tool which just executes a user defined statement and prints out the
SQLException.getMessage() text. This currently works well, although a
Line number in the message for CREATE FUNCTION errors would be nice
(Users have asked for this, so they can get the same helpfull message as
PGAdmin). The second issue is that I am building a Procedure/Function
editor which displays the error message after a CREATE FUNCTION in a
Grid, where the user can double click on the error message and my tool
will automatically highlight the line which has the error. All I really
need is the line number, although if it gives me the character position
I can easily calculate the line number.
It doesn't really matter to me how I get the line number, whether a
"Line X" in the message or a PGException specific class. The reason is
because my tool has specific code for all databases that it supports.
For example, the procedure editor that I am working on gets the line
number for Oracle by quering the all_errors table, it gets the line
number for SQL Server by parsing the getMessage() text which has the
Line number at the beginning of the text, it gets the line number for
Sybase Anywhere from the getMessage() text which is at the end of the
text and for Sybase it gets it from a SybSQLException class specific
with Sybase errors.
So, it doesn't really matter how the line number is presented to me, I
already have code to parse it. And it doesn't matter if it is
PostgreSQL specific because I have alot of PG specific code already.
thanks
-Niels
Oliver Jowett wrote:
>Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>
>>On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Perhaps we should put accessors for the various message parts on
>>>PSQLException, but leave the SQLException message as it currently is.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>This could work for a pg specific admin tool or client, but not a
>>generic/portable java client.
>>
>>
>
>Right, but aren't we talking about a client that knows about postgresql
>internals anyway? There's no concept of line numbers, hints, etc.
>associated with an exception in standard JDBC anyway, and as you said
>it's not obvious what is useful to have in the error message for
>standard clients.
>
>Niels was talking about putting the line number into the message, then
>parsing the message to get this info. That seems pretty horrible since
>then you have lots of extra work in the app, and the app is still
>postgresql-specific.. It seems much cleaner if it can just do something
>like:
>
> try {
> // ...
> } catch (PSQLException e) {
> if (e instanceof PSQLException)
> linenumber = ((PSQLException)e).getLineNumber();
> else
> linenumber = -1;
>
> // handle exception
> }
>
>-O
>
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anthony Chaffey | 2005-04-06 10:10:07 | An I/O error occured while sending to the backend |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-04-05 23:29:32 | Re: Minor Feature Request |