| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robin Ericsson <robin(dot)ericsson(at)profecta(dot)se>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
| Date: | 2005-04-05 21:49:31 |
| Message-ID: | 425307EB.2040100@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>
>Or were you trying to say "let's ship it, and I don't care if major
>Linux distributors refuse to include it in their packaging because it's
>too hard to build that way"?
>
Close but not quite :). I was saying that Linux distributors are
going to do what their users want. Otherwise the distribution
dies.
So just because it is in core doesn't mean they have to package.
Also, alot of people compile from tarball to get an optimized version.
So having plPHP in core would be helpful for them.
> Somehow that doesn't seem to square with
>the goal of making plPHP more available rather than less so.
>
>
Very true :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
> regards, tom lane
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lucas F. | 2005-04-05 22:24:27 | array_append not working |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-05 21:46:50 | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-04-05 22:18:45 | Re: REINDEX ALL |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-05 21:46:50 | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |