From: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Postgresql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: contrib/dbsize |
Date: | 2005-04-05 17:25:01 |
Message-ID: | 4252C9ED.4030000@selectacast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
local]:o=>select version();
version
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 7.4.7 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.2.2
20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)
(1 row)
[local]:o=>select relation_size('pg_am_oid_index');
ERROR: "pg_am_oid_index" is an index
Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:24:02PM -0400, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
>>How come relation_size() doesn't work on an index?
>
>
> Could you define "doesn't work"? An example with the expected and
> actual output might show what's happening.
>
> I just ran some simple tests and relation_size() correctly showed
> the on-disk size of the file that stores the index. Are you expecting
> something different? Or have you found a case where relation_size()
> returns the wrong value?
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-04-05 17:36:15 | Re: contrib/dbsize |
Previous Message | David Rysdam | 2005-04-05 17:19:13 | Re: Check for existence of index |