| From: | Poul Møller Hansen <freebsd(at)pbnet(dot)dk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Loosing connection with the database |
| Date: | 2005-04-02 17:28:54 |
| Message-ID: | 424ED656.90909@pbnet.dk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>2005-04-02 00:09:01 ERROR: invalid string enlargement request size
>>1358954492
>>2005-04-02 00:09:01 WARNING: AbortTransaction and not in in-progress
>>state
>>2005-04-02 00:09:01 FATAL: invalid frontend message type 82
>>
>>
>
>This indicates the client code didn't follow the protocol properly,
>ie, it sent garbage where a message length word ought to be.
>
>This sort of thing has been seen to occur when multiple client-side
>threads try to use the same database connection without proper locking
>to ensure only one thread uses it at a time. See for example
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00104.php
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
This is exactly what I am doing. Must admit I haven't considered that as
an issue.
For performance reasons I suppose one database connection per client are
preferred
rather than using synchronized on the db class ?
Thanks a lot for bringing it to my attention
BR, Poul
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-02 17:32:47 | Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-02 17:00:07 | Re: Loosing connection with the database |