Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-02 05:19:32
Message-ID: 424E2B64.4040709@commandprompt.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


>
>I'm thinking that a pl/PHP is much more interesting for the long term
>than, say, pl/tcl (mind you, I am a Tcl partisan from way back, but
>I see that many people are not so enlightened). Barring any licensing
>problems I think this is something to pursue.
>
>
Per the license issue it is licensed under the PHP and PostgreSQL
licenses.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 285 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-04-02 05:38:19 Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-02 05:17:49 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-04-02 05:38:19 Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-02 05:17:49 Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?