Re: [HACKERS] contrib/pg_buffercache

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib/pg_buffercache
Date: 2005-03-31 23:41:19
Message-ID: 424C8A9F.6090106@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> I didn't see the original of the later patch, which is why I sent in
> mine. I honestly don't care that much either way, although I'm inclined
> to agree that the header file is just unnecessary noise.
>

Well, looks like a strong feeling for no header :-). I didn't really
think about *not* having one to be honest. So, anyway - instead of
inviting Neil to spend valuable time eliminating it, I should do it
myself...

So, please ignore my previous patch to the header file, and consider
this one - which eliminates it completely.

best wishes

Mark

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_buffercache-noheader.patch text/plain 1.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2005-04-01 00:08:43 Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-03-31 23:23:10 Re: [ADMIN] Excessive growth of pg_attribute and other system tables

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2005-04-01 00:08:43 Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-03-31 18:15:40 Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments