From: | T E Schmitz <mailreg(at)numerixtechnology(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: cost of CREATE VIEW ... AS SELECT DISTINCT |
Date: | 2005-03-29 10:07:20 |
Message-ID: | 424928D8.7060705@numerixtechnology.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hello Scott,
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 15:43, T E Schmitz wrote:
>
>>How expensive would it be to maintain the following VIEW:
>>
>>CREATE VIEW origin AS SELECT DISTINCT origin FROM transaktion
>>
>>if there is in index on transaktion.origin; the table transaktion has
>>thousands of records and there are only a few distinct origin?
>
>
> The cost will only be encurred when running the view. if you want
> materialized views (which WOULD have maintenance costs) you'll have to
Thank you for the pointer - that might come in handy for another scenario.
> The cost of executing that view should be the same as the cost of
> running the query by hand.
I did an EXPLAIN ANALYZE and a sequential scan was carried out despite
the index I had on the column. Maybe this is because I only have very
few records in my test DB.
Would the "SELECT DISTINCT origin" always cause a sequential table scan
regardless whether there is an index on the origin column or not?
--
Regards/Gruß,
Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-03-29 10:12:45 | Re: Merging item codes using referential integrity |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-03-29 07:59:44 | Re: Executing Anonymous Blocks |