From: | Bricklen Anderson <bricklen(at)shaw(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | plpgsql no longer exists |
Date: | 2005-03-27 20:27:54 |
Message-ID: | 4247174A.3020306@shaw.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi listers!
I'll start with some details:
select version();
PostgreSQL 8.0.0 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian
1:3.3.3-5)
Upon compiling a new function that I was working on, I came across an error:
"could not read block 0 of relation 1663/17239/16709: Bad address" which was
being triggered by my trying to compile my function.
The relation in question turned out to be pg_language. I reindexed that table
and the "could not read block..." error went away, then I started to get the
"...language "plpgsql" does not exist..." (as shown after the following function):
-- note, this is only a test function, but it yields the same error:
dev=# create function text() returns void as $$
dev=# begin
dev=# return;
dev=# end;
dev=# $$ language plpgsql;
ERROR: language "plpgsql" does not exist
HINT: You need to use "createlang" to load the language into the database.
I then issued a "createlang plpgsql <this_db>"
-- checked the pg_language table at this point (which I probably should have
done before I went and ran the createlang command)
dev=# select lanname,lanplcallfoid,lanvalidator from pg_language;
lanname | lanplcallfoid | lanvalidator
---------------------------------------
plpgsql | 17811 | 17812
plpgsql | 17811 | 17812
internal | 0 | 2246
c | 0 | 2247
plperlu | 17808 | 0
plperl | 17808 | 0
sql | 0 | 2248
Apparently plpgsql does exist. It also now had duplicate entries for plpgsql. I
replaced the contents of the table with the all of the same values, minus one of
the duplicates and reindexed it. I restarted my postmaster, and the missing
language error went away.
Now when I am running any function, I am getting:
"ERROR: cache lookup failed for language 17813" (or occasionally, 17810 or 17809).
Once I recompile the function, I no longer get that message. Is there anything
else that I can check or do to make this stop happening? Or is this a sign of
things to come (possible corruption, etc?)
Thanks for any help!
Cheers,
Bricklen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2005-03-27 21:00:39 | Re: Perl and AutoCommit |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-03-27 19:19:40 | Re: Clustering system tables |