From: | Zeki <zekispam(at)freewebz(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Brian O'Reilly" <fade(at)deepsky(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1552: massive performance hit between 7.4 and 8.0.1 |
Date: | 2005-03-21 15:27:17 |
Message-ID: | 423EE7D5.7090506@freewebz.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-performance |
Have you tried an analyze after 1,000 or so inserts? Also, you should
be able to disable sequence scans for the duration of the connection
using SET enable_seqscan=false.
-Zeki
Brian O'Reilly wrote:
>The following bug has been logged online:
>
>Bug reference: 1552
>Logged by: Brian O'Reilly
>Email address: fade(at)deepsky(dot)com
>PostgreSQL version: 8.0.1
>Operating system: Linux 2.6.11
>Description: massive performance hit between 7.4 and 8.0.1
>Details:
>
>When doing a lot of inserts to an empty table with a foreign key to another
>table, there is an incredible performance degredation issue on 8.0.1. I have
>a program that is inserting rows in an iterative loop, and in this form it
>inserts about 110,000 rows. On postgresql 7.4 on a debian machine it takes a
>shade over 2 minutes to complete. On an amd64 box running gentoo, it takes
>over an hour and fourty minutes to complete. The query plan on the debian
>host that completes quickly follows:
>
> "Fast" machine, Debian, PSQL 7.4:
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----------------------------------------------------
> Index Scan using requirements_pkey on requirements (cost=0.00..4.82 rows=2
>width=0) (actual time=0.013..0.013 rows=0 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (reqid = 10::bigint)
> Total runtime: 0.134 ms
>(3 rows)
>
>and the query plan on the 'slow' machine:
>
>
> QUERY PLAN
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------------------
> Seq Scan on requirements (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=0) (actual
>time=0.002..0.002 rows=0 loops=1)
> Filter: (reqid = 10::bigint)
> Total runtime: 0.040 ms
>(3 rows)
>
>The script I am using to show this behaviour follows:
>
>CREATE TABLE packages
> (name text PRIMARY KEY);
>CREATE TABLE binary_packages
> (name text REFERENCES packages,
> version text,
> PRIMARY KEY(name, version));
>CREATE TABLE requirements
> (reqid bigint PRIMARY KEY,
> name text,
> version text,
> FOREIGN KEY (name, version) REFERENCES
>binary_packages);
>CREATE TABLE constraints
> (constid bigint PRIMARY KEY,
> reqid bigint REFERENCES requirements,
> type text,
> name text REFERENCES packages,
> version text DEFAULT '',
> relation character(2));
>
>explain analyze select 1 from only requirements where reqid='10';
>
>the query optimiser seems to be setting a default strategy of doing
>sequential scans on an empty table, which is a fast strategy when the table
>is empty and not particularly full, but obviously on a large table the
>performance is O(N^2). This is clearly a bug. Please let me know if I can
>provide any more information.
>
>Brian O'Reilly
>System Architect.,
>DeepSky Media Resources
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guido Barosio | 2005-03-21 17:22:02 | BUG #1554: wrong character on the sjis_to_utf8.map file |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-03-21 04:48:18 | Re: BUG #1553: Function arguments and table fields |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-03-21 16:07:25 | Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2005-03-21 14:59:22 | Re: column name is "LIMIT" |