| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIN1252 patch broke my database |
| Date: | 2005-03-17 00:11:38 |
| Message-ID: | 4238CB3A.3030101@samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, 8.1 will require a dump/reload for upgrade. I think we decided
> that was going to be necessary.
>
> That has aleady happened for 8.1:
>
> date: 2005/02/28 03:45:21; author: neilc; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2
> Implement max() and min() aggregates for array types. Patch from Koju
> Iijima, reviewed by Neil Conway. Catalog version number bumped,
> regression tests updated.
Yes, as well as 4 other patches that have bumped the catversion number.
I think we are well past the point at which an 8.1 without an initdb
would be a plausible option (barring the materialization of a working
pg_upgrade tool, of course).
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2005-03-17 00:37:33 | Re: read-only database |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-03-16 23:47:42 | Re: WIN1252 patch broke my database |