From: | Gary Doades <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without |
Date: | 2005-03-10 19:12:48 |
Message-ID: | 42309C30.7060107@gpdnet.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Would those of you with access to other DBMSes try this:
>
> create table tab (col integer);
> select 1 from tab having 1=0;
> select 1 from tab having 1=1;
> insert into tab values(1);
> insert into tab values(2);
> select 1 from tab having 1=0;
> select 1 from tab having 1=1;
>
> I claim that a SQL-conformant database will return 0, 1, 0, and 1 rows
MS SQL Server 2000 returns 0, 1, 0 and 1 rows correctly.
Cheers,
Gary.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-03-10 19:24:41 | Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2005-03-10 18:34:08 | Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nicolai Tufar | 2005-03-10 19:22:13 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2005-03-10 18:34:08 | Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY |