From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Upcoming PG re-releases |
Date: | 2005-12-01 02:21:43 |
Message-ID: | 4230.24.211.165.134.1133403703.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Tom Lane said:
>
> We hashed all this out in the pghackers list back in August, but I
> agree there ought to be something about it on the website.
>
The reason I asked again is that, notwithstanding the recent discussion, I
have observed confusion about the matter (including Jan telling me he didn't
think there was any agreed policy).
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-12-01 03:56:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-12-01 01:41:52 | Problem with COPY CSV |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-12-01 03:56:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2005-12-01 01:36:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |