| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG_MODULE_MAGIC check in 8.2 |
| Date: | 2006-11-16 20:15:27 |
| Message-ID: | 423.1163708127@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> That said, do you have to specify the library kernel32? If you use
> language "internal", doesn't that find it since it's already loaded?
This has come up before:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-06/msg00721.php
That particular thread died off when we realized that the complained-of
usage never worked anyway. But we didn't thoroughly discuss the
question of whether there are any significant cases where it makes sense
to be able to LOAD a file that contains no PG-specific code whatsoever.
I'm inclined to think not --- at least, not significant enough that we
should destroy the usefulness of the magic-block check to let this work.
It could be debated though. Does anyone have any more-compelling
examples?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-16 20:35:11 | Re: How to crash postgres using savepoints |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-16 20:04:45 | Re: Not your father's question about deadlocks |